HuntAustin, a Joint Venture—Terminal 3 Modernization

HuntAustin, a Joint Venture—Terminal 3 Modernization

Phoenix’s Sky Harbor Airport keeps pace with the area’s growth with help from HuntAustin. By Chris Kelsch There has been…

More...
UPS – Centennial Hub Expansion

UPS – Centennial Hub Expansion

UPS delivers more than packages ahead of schedule, such as its new sorting facility. By Chris Kelsch In picking someone…

More...
Okland Construction – Phoenix International Raceway

Okland Construction – Phoenix International Raceway

Okland Construction takes lessons from Daytona Speedway as it modernizes Phoenix International Raceway. By Tim O’Connor The first batch of…

More...
Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Hensel Phelps Construction plans to arrive on time with the Austin Bergstrom International Airport expansion.  By Kat Zeman One of…

More...
The Holland Companies – The Factory at 46 Wareham

The Holland Companies – The Factory at 46 Wareham

The Holland Companies aims to revitalize a dilapidated street with its latest project. By Bianca Herron For more than 50…

More...
Perini Management Services Inc. – Alcatraz Island

Perini Management Services Inc. – Alcatraz Island

PMSI is on track to finish its restoration work on Alcatraz Island this fall. By Alan Dorich Perini Management Services…

More...
Jonas Construction Software

Jonas Construction Software

Jonas Construction Software prides itself on developing industry-leading software that construction companies can count on to succeed. By Janice Hoppe-Spiers,…

More...

 

FEATURED CONTENT

 

EXCLUSIVE FEATURES

 

EDITOR'S BLOG / SPECIAL FOCUS

 

Read All Blog Posts  Read All Special Focus

 

CIVIL / COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / INSTITUTIONAL / RESIDENTIAL

 

Read All Civil   Read All Commercial   Read All Industrial   Read All Institutional  Read All Residential

Current Issue

Check out our latest edition!

 

alan blog ct

newswirelogo

  • NEW YORK, Oct. 20, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds owners of the Class A Common Stock of MINDBODY, Inc. (NASDAQ: MB) who sold shares between November 7, 2018 through February 15, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important deadline in the securities class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for MINDBODY investors under the federal securities laws.

  • NEW YORK, Oct. 20, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of ViewRay, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRAY) from March 15, 2019 through August 8, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important November 12, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for ViewRay investors under the federal securities laws.

    To join the ViewRay class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1676.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

    NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

    According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) demand for ViewRay systems had declined due in part to changes being made to Medicare reimbursement approaches first announced in November 2018 that could make purchases of new ViewRay systems less profitable for customers; (2) ViewRay’s reported backlog was overstated due to the inclusion of orders with insufficient surety as to permit for their inclusion in reported backlog; and (3) as a result, ViewRay’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

    A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 12, 2019. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1676.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com.

  • NEW YORK, Oct. 19, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with Uber’s May 2019 initial public stock offering (the “IPO” or the “Offering”) of the important December 3, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Uber investors under the federal securities laws.

    To join the Uber class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1650.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

    NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

    According to the lawsuit, the Registration Statement featured false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) at the time of the Offering, Uber was rapidly increasing subsidies for drivers and customers’ rides as well as meals in a bid for market share, which caused Uber’s sales and marketing expenses to swell; (2) defendants were cutting, or planned to cut, costs in key areas that undermined Uber’s central growth opportunities; and (3) as a result, defendants’ statements about Uber’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

  • NEW YORK, Oct. 19, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of the securities of Ruhnn Holding Limited (NASDAQ: RUHN) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with Ruhnn’s April 3, 2019 initial public stock offering (the “IPO” or the “Offering”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Ruhnn investors under the federal securities laws.

    To join the Ruhnn class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1686.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

    NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

    According to the lawsuit, the Registration Statement contained false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) at the time of the IPO, the number of Ruhnn’s online stores had declined by nearly 40%; (2) at the time of the IPO, the number of Ruhnn’s full-service Key Opinion Leaders had declined by nearly 44%; (3) Ruhnn’s net revenues derived from its full-service segment had declined by 46% on a sequential basis; and (4) as a result, defendants’ statements about Ruhnn’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

  • NEW YORK, Oct. 19, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of MacroGenics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MGNX) from February 6, 2019 through June 3, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important November 12, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in the case. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for MacroGenics investors under the federal securities laws.

Contact Us

Construction Today Magazine
150 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601

  312.676.1100
  312.676.1101

Click here for a full list of contacts.

Latest Edition

Spread The Love

Back To Top